Greetings friends and lets welcome this 2010 and hope, pray and act to make this year a turning point for the planet toward life-sustaining, life respecting and stewardship frame of mind with respect to the planets resources.
I had a good 2009 personally in that I have a son to welcome into the world – born in Visakhapatnam, India on August 26. Needless to say it is an amazing experience. It reminded me of a comment made by my good friend Bruno Biberon, a chartered accountant by profession and an avid surfer, regarding his own son. He wanted to save the oceans biomass which is disappearing at an alarming rate BECAUSE his son won’t have the opportunity of experiencing the wonders of the oceans as we, in this generation and ALL previous generations, have had the good fortune of enjoying it. I was amazed, impressed and taken back by the scale of his objective and bringing the global problem home as it addresses his immediate and compelling concern. Saving the oceans biomass comment does not seem so far-fetched and distant to me now after my own son was born. If the majority of ordinary citizens of the world share this scale of sentiments then a sustainable world is well within our reach.
A more important change that I experience now after my son is born is that I should not take myself too seriously. The planet will do just fine and the human spirit is amazing, resilient, adaptable and smart to boot. Here is a case in point.
I came across Emily Pilloton’s Design H project on sustainability this morning and as usual with this type of information, it blew my mind with the simple, yet powerful philosophy underlying the project. Buckminister Fuller always maintained that there are enough resources in the planet to make all the billions of people comfortable and yet be sustainable if we employ innovative engineering designs that use only fraction of inputs than we currently use. Society was “forced” to acknowledge his genius only after many years of marginalizing his ideas and work and it begs the question as to why that is so. My opinion is that it boils down to simplistic tendencies of “easy” profits – for the suppliers of raw materials like steel, oil and lumber and for the value adding services sectors of transforming those raw materials into useful engineering artifacts. There was no upside to reducing the inputs or worrying about letting tons of noxious gases into the atmosphere or tons of effluents discharging into the water ways and oceans destroying the biomass.
The economic model in the world today tends to glorify, indeed deify, the capital inputs needed for economic activity and marginalize the effort (labor) and “entitlement” to use, thrash and claim the planets natural resources. Essentially, someone with a fist full of dollars or euros or yuans can buy / lease 10,000 acres in most corners of the earth, mouth some niceties to the local politicians or “leaders” as they term themselves, and proceed to ravage, pilfer and rape the landscape and exploit the local inhabitants with ”economic growth opportunities”. I am referring to projects such as 5000 acres to open a nuclear power plant for electricity near Vizainagaram, a quarter kilometer wide canal diverting Godavari river waters for industrial development and leaving dried up silt land to the local farmers in East Godavari district, or opening a VW plant at Vizag that requires 1800 acres of land primarily for exports. Of course the modern MBA types get shocked at the suggestion that these projects might not be a good idea.
The arguments are well-known, commonplace and simplistic. But what they fail to realize is that by building a nuclear power plant at a site, you are altering the local mini eco system – the biological, botanical, atmospheric and social aspects in about 5000 acres and you are doing this for eternity or for a time frame so far in the future it is hard to fathom. What gives ANYONE the right to alter a land mass of 5000 acres FOREVER from a finite quantity available on this planet that belongs to ALL life on the planet and that belongs to the planet earth itself.
The reference to ALL life gets deeper with this native american saying ” This land belongs to my people. Some of my people are living, some are dead, but MOST are yet to be born”. So to all those MBA types and pseudo MBA types (who think they are brilliant business men), I say this – remember who owns this land (despite your politician designed ownership title deeds) – it belongs to all LIFE yet to be born and you are just a steward, a guest and a visitor who has come for a short stay. If you believe in reincarnation, then you and your uncle parthasaradhi will probably revisit this planet many times in the future. Don’t mess it up and more importantly, don’t do things that alter the environment permanently forever.
So whats the alternative to a nuclear power plant given that we are not advocating anyone to go back to living in the jungles. May be the bloom box from Bloom energy, solar thermal installations covering every street and highway, or an automated computerised driverless public transportation system that operates like a private car – point a to point b door to door with electricity (thus making your VW plant redundant but then you already altered the mini eco systems in 1800 acres permanently). Heck, if we can track Al Faida operatives with drones, then driverless mini-buses are a cake walk.
Alex Steffen of www.worldchanging.com proposes “smart cities” of which New York is a good example and a harbinger of what is possible because of the compact and efficient living, working and playing environment of high quality. If we solve people’s need for a good life in a sustainable way, then everything else will fall in place because of good education and general well-being.
Lets encourage Emily Pilloton’s work – comment, donate, participate and at the least take a few minutes to read about her wonderful work for the betterment of humanity.
Cheers for now